Goedecke, Maximilian, Kuehn, Florian, Stratos, Ioannis, Vasan, Robin, Pertschy, Annette and Klar, Ernst (2019). No need for surgery? Patterns and outcomes of blunt abdominal trauma. Innov. Surg. Sci., 4 (3). S. 100 - 109. BERLIN: WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH. ISSN 2364-7485

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Introduction: The management of a patient suffering from blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) remains a challenge for the emergency physician. Within the last few years, the standard therapy for hemodynamically stable patients with BAT has transitioned to a non-operative approach. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcome of patients with BAT and to determine the reasons for failure of non-operative management (NOM). Materials and methods: Analysis of 176 consecutive patients treated for BAT was conducted in a German level 1 trauma center from 2004 to 2011. Abdominal injuries were classified according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST). Patients included were demonstrated to have objective abdominal trauma with either free fluid on focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) or computed tomography (CT), or proven organ injury. Results: Patients, 142 of 176 (80.7%), with BAT were initially managed non-operatively, with a success rate of 90%. The rates of NOM success were higher among those with less severe injuries; 100% with Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) of 1. In total, 125 patients (71.0%) were managed non-operatively, and 51 (29.0%) required surgical intervention. NOM failure occurred in 9.2% of the patients, the most common reason being initially undiagnosed intestinal perforation (46.2%). Positive correlation was identified (r = 0.512; p < 0.001) between the ISS (injury severity score) and the NACA (National Advisory Committee of Aeronautics) score. The delay in operation in NOM failure was 6 h in patients with underlying hepatic or splenic rupture and 34 h with intestinal perforation. The overall mortality of 5.1% was attributed especially to old age (p = 0.016), high severity of injury ( p < 0.001), and greater need for blood transfusion ( p < 0.001). Conclusion: NOM was successful for the vast majority of blunt abdominal trauma patients, especially those with less severe injuries. NOM failure and operative delay were most commonly due to occult hollow viscus injury (HVI), the detection of which was achieved by close-clinical observation and abdominal ultrasound in conjunction with monitoring for rising markers of infection and by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) if additionally indicated. Based on this concept, the delay in operation in patients with NOM failure was short. This study underscores the feasibility and benefit of NOM in BAT.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Goedecke, MaximilianUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Kuehn, FlorianUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Stratos, IoannisUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Vasan, RobinUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Pertschy, AnnetteUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Klar, ErnstUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-142112
DOI: 10.1515/iss-2018-0004
Journal or Publication Title: Innov. Surg. Sci.
Volume: 4
Number: 3
Page Range: S. 100 - 109
Date: 2019
Publisher: WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
Place of Publication: BERLIN
ISSN: 2364-7485
Language: English
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
HOLLOW VISCUS INJURY; NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT; MESENTERIC INJURY; MULTIDETECTOR CT; LAPAROSCOPY; LIVER; BOWEL; ASSOCIATION; SYSTEMMultiple languages
SurgeryMultiple languages
Refereed: Yes
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/14211

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item