Baltin, C. T., Bludau, M., Kron, F., Zander, T., Hallek, M., Hoelscher, A. H. and Schroeder, W. (2018). Profit center analysis of esophagectomy. Economical analysis of transthoracic esophagectomy depending on postoperative complications. Chirurg, 89 (3). S. 229 - 237. NEW YORK: SPRINGER. ISSN 1433-0385

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Due to increasing medical costs and yet limited financial resources, medical treatment and economic analyses can no longer be separated; therefore, direct costing and cost unit accounting become more and more relevant as controlling tools in hospital management. Transthoracic esophagectomy is an integral part of the current treatment concept in patients with esophageal carcinoma. The question of the present study was whether the present diagnosis-related groups (DRG) system is a cost-effective tool to represent transthoracic esophagectomy. In this retrospective study at a high-volume center, 161 consecutive patients with esophageal carcinoma were included. All patients were surgically treated according to the current S3 guidelines by a transthoracic esophagectomy. Detailed and standardized documentation of the postoperative complications was made according to the classification of Clavien-Dindo and the guidelines of the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG). For each individual patient, the respective actual costs were analyzed according to the Institute for the Remuneration System in Hospitals (InEK) cost accounting approach comparing DRG payments (DRG G03A) on a case level including all extra fees per DRG catalogue. The mean costs per case of all included 161 patients were 24,338. (median: 19,210., range: 12,149-127,376.), while mean payments per case of 22,591. were recorded. For the entire study population, the profit margin was -281,330. (mean: -1747.). Only patients with an uncomplicated course (Clavien-Dindo 0) yielded a slightly positive profit margin of 2514.. With increasing complication score the profit margin became increasingly negative (Clavien-Dindo I: -2878., Clavien-Dindo IVb: -58,543.). Within the analysis of the InEK target cost matrix, main cost drivers can be identified as medical services (22.3%) and non-medical infrastructure (18.7%). Surgical treatment according to the existing guidelines of patients with esophageal carcinoma is not cost-covering in high-volume centers and cannot be solely financed by existing DRG revenues.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Baltin, C. T.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Bludau, M.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Kron, F.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Zander, T.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Hallek, M.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Hoelscher, A. H.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Schroeder, W.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-193258
DOI: 10.1007/s00104-018-0590-9
Journal or Publication Title: Chirurg
Volume: 89
Number: 3
Page Range: S. 229 - 237
Date: 2018
Publisher: SPRINGER
Place of Publication: NEW YORK
ISSN: 1433-0385
Language: German
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
CANCER; OUTCOMESMultiple languages
SurgeryMultiple languages
Refereed: Yes
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/19325

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item