Hoffmann, Michael (2017). Unfree labour after the Maoist Revolution in western Nepal. Contrib. India. Sociol., 51 (2). S. 139 - 163. NEW DELHI: SAGE PUBLICATIONS INDIA PVT LTD. ISSN 0973-0648

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

What does 'unfree labour' mean in a post-revolutionary context? Based on an ethnographic fieldwork undertaken between 2008 and 2009 in the far-western lowlands of Nepal, this article argues that the brick kiln owners on the Nepal-India border continued their attempts to bind labour by handing out advances and delaying payments, despite the fact that the state had prohibited all forms of bonded labour under the Bonded Labour Abolition Act of 2001. However, the employers and the workers accepted this system of unfree labour only as long as it remained within certain boundaries. I conclude by suggesting that the Maoist Revolution should be judged as a partial revolution: although it addressed some inequalities, it neglected others due to an ideologically narrow framing of the meaning of unfree labour.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Hoffmann, MichaelUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-229331
DOI: 10.1177/0069966717697417
Journal or Publication Title: Contrib. India. Sociol.
Volume: 51
Number: 2
Page Range: S. 139 - 163
Date: 2017
Publisher: SAGE PUBLICATIONS INDIA PVT LTD
Place of Publication: NEW DELHI
ISSN: 0973-0648
Language: English
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
BONDED LABOR; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; AGRICULTURE; INDUSTRYMultiple languages
SociologyMultiple languages
Refereed: Yes
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/22933

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item