Zaeske, C., Hickethier, T., Borggrefe, J., Goertz, L., Dettmeyer, R., Schlamann, M., Abdullayev, N. and Kabbasch, C. (2021). Postinterventional Assessment after Stent and Flow-Diverter Implantation Using CT: Influence of Spectral Image Reconstructions and Different Device Types. Am. J. Neuroradiol., 42 (3). S. 516 - 524. DENVILLE: AMER SOC NEURORADIOLOGY. ISSN 1936-959X

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: CTA provides a noninvasive alternative technique to DSA in the follow-up after endovascular aneurysm treatment to evaluate aneurysm occlusion and exclude intraluminal narrowing after stent or flow-diverter implantation; however, assessability may be impeded by stent material artifacts. The objective of this in vitro study was to compare the visual assessability of different conventional stents and flow diverters as well as different reconstructions of dual-layer CT images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four conventional intracranial stents and 4 flow diverters were implanted in identical aneurysm phantoms. Conventional and monoenergetic images (40, 50, 60, 90, 120, 180?keV) were acquired to evaluate attenuation alteration, visible lumen diameter, and SNR. Image quality was rated subjectively by 2 independent radiologists using a 4-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Low kiloelectron volt (40?60?keV) monoenergetic reconstructions showed an improved SNR and an improved lumen density ratio compared with high kiloelectron volt reconstructions (90?180?keV) and conventional reconstructions, however without reaching significance compared with the latter. Assessment of the adjacent aneurysm and subjective evaluation was not affected by the imaging technique and stent type. Artifact susceptibility varied with the device used and increased among flow diverters. CONCLUSIONS: Low kiloelectron volt reconstructions improved the assessment of the stent lumen in comparison with high kiloelectron volt reconstructions. No significant improvement in image quality could be shown compared with conventional images. For some devices, iodine-specific reconstructions led to severe artifacts and are therefore not recommended. There was no relevant improvement in the assessability of the adjacent aneurysm.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Zaeske, C.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Hickethier, T.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Borggrefe, J.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Goertz, L.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Dettmeyer, R.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Schlamann, M.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Abdullayev, N.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Kabbasch, C.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-569982
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6952
Journal or Publication Title: Am. J. Neuroradiol.
Volume: 42
Number: 3
Page Range: S. 516 - 524
Date: 2021
Publisher: AMER SOC NEURORADIOLOGY
Place of Publication: DENVILLE
ISSN: 1936-959X
Language: English
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
Clinical Neurology; Neuroimaging; Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical ImagingMultiple languages
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/56998

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item