Recker, Jan C. ORCID: 0000-0002-2072-5792 (2016). Author responsibilities in improving the quality of peer reviews: A rejoinder to Iivari (2016). Communications of the Association for Information Systems : CAIS, 38 (18). pp. 314-320. New York, NY: ACM. ISSN 1529-3181

Full text not available from this repository.
Link to the document: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/92399/

Abstract

In this rejoinder to Iivari (2016), I discuss authors' responsibilities in the process of ensuring quality reviews. I argue that one overlooked element in quality peer reviewing is authors' unconstrained right to submit manuscripts in whatever form or quality they desire. As such, I suggest adding some constraints and offering more freedom to reviewers to maintain viability of the scholarly publication system. I offer three responses to Iivari's suggestions and add two further suggestions for change.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Recker, Jan C.UNSPECIFIEDorcid.org/0000-0002-2072-5792
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-87437
DOI: 10.17705/1CAIS.03818
Journal or Publication Title: Communications of the Association for Information Systems : CAIS
Publisher: ACM
ISSN: 1529-3181
Volume: 38
Number: 18
Subjects: Data processing Computer science
Management and auxiliary services
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
Peer ReviewEnglish
PeerAuthor ResponsibilitiesEnglish
Scholarly PublishingEnglish
AcademiaEnglish
Faculty: Faculty of Management, Economy and Social Sciences
Divisions: Weitere Institute, Arbeits- und Forschungsgruppen > Cologne Institute for Information Systems (CIIS)
Language: English
Date: January 2016
Place of Publication: New York, NY
Refereed: Yes
Page Range: pp. 314-320
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/8743

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item