<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Artefacts and Errors: Acknowledging Issues of Representation in the Digital: Imaging of Ancient Texts</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Melissa M.</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Terras</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>It is assumed, in palaeography, papyrology and epigraphy, that a certain amount of&#13;
uncertainty is inherent in the reading of damaged and abraded texts. Yet we have&#13;
not really grappled with the fact that, nowadays, as many scholars tend to deal with&#13;
digital images of texts, rather than handling the texts themselves, the procedures for&#13;
creating digital images of texts can insert further uncertainty into the representation&#13;
of the text created. Technical distortions can lead to the unintentional introduction&#13;
of ‘artefacts’ into images, which can have an effect on the resulting representation. If&#13;
we cannot trust our digital surrogates of texts, can we trust the readings from them?&#13;
How do scholars acknowledge the quality of digitised images of texts? Furthermore,&#13;
this leads us to the type of discussions of representation that have been present in&#13;
Classical texts since Plato: digitisation can be considered as an alternative form of&#13;
representation, bringing to the modern debate of the use of digital technology in Classics&#13;
the familiar theories of mimesis (imitation) and ekphrasis (description): the conversion&#13;
of visual evidence into explicit descriptions of that information, stored in computer&#13;
files in distinct linguistic terms, with all the difficulties of conversion understood in the&#13;
ekphratic process. The community has not yet considered what becoming dependent&#13;
on digital texts means for the field, both in practical and theoretical terms. Issues of&#13;
quality, copying, representation, and substance should be part of our dialogue when&#13;
we consult digital surrogates of documentary material, yet we are just constructing&#13;
understandings of what it means to rely on virtual representations of artefacts. It is&#13;
necessary to relate our understandings of uncertainty in palaeography and epigraphy&#13;
to our understanding of the mechanics of visualization employed by digital imaging&#13;
techniques, if we are to fully understand the impact that these will have.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">Informatik, Datenverarbeitung</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">Schrift, Buch, Bibliothek</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">Fotografie</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">Geschichte</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">Alte Geschichte, Archäologie</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2011</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Books on Demand (BoD)</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Beitrag in einem Buch, einem Tagungsband oder einem juristischen Kommentar</mods:genre></mods:mods>