Enders, Philip ORCID: 0000-0002-9527-4957, Hall, Jonathan, Bornhauser, Marco, Mansouri, Kaweh, Altay, Lebriz, Schrader, Stefan, Dietlein, Thomas S., Bachmann, Bjoern O., Neuhann, Thomas and Cursiefen, Claus (2019). Telemetric Intraocular Pressure Monitoring after Boston Keratoprosthesis Surgery Using the Eyemate-IO Sensor: Dynamics in the First Year. Am. J. Ophthalmol., 206. S. 256 - 264. NEW YORK: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC. ISSN 1879-1891

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the dynamics of telemetrically measured intraocular pressure (IOP) during the first year after implantation of a Boston keratoprosthesis type I (BI-KPro) cornea and to compare agreement of telemetric IOP measurements with finger palpations. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial. METHODS: In the ARGOS (NCT02945176) study, 12 individuals underwent implantation of an Eyemate-IO intraocular system. Follow-up after surgery took place 12 months later with 13 visits planned per patient. During BI-KPro surgery, an electromagnetic induction sensor ring enabling telemetric IOP data transfer to a hand-held reading device outside the eye was implanted into the ciliary sulcus with or without trans-scleral suture fixation. Comprehensive ophthalmic examinations and IOP assessments through the telemetric system were compared to IOP assessed by finger palpation by 2 experts. RESULTS: Preoperative IOP measured by Goldmann tonometry was 13.4 +/- 6.2 mm Hg. Telemetric IOP peaked at 23.1 +/- 16.5 mm Hg at the first postoperative day. On day 5, mean IOP was 16.0 +/- 5.2 mm Hg and 20.95 +/- 6.5 mm Hg after 6-12 months. IOP estimation by finger palpation was grouped in 4 categories: normal, A; soft/hypotonic, B; borderline, C; and hypertonic, D. Mean telemetric IOP was 18.2 +/- 6.1 mm Hg in category A, 8.9 +/- 2.8 mm Hg in B, 22.4 +/- 4.9 mm Hg in C, and 34.3 +/- 11.0 mm Hg in D. Differences in mean telemetric IOPs per category were statistically significant (P < .001). Daily IOP fluctuations and peaks could be identified. CONCLUSIONS: Telemetric IOP assessment seems to be able to identify postoperative IOP peaks and a longitudinal increase of IOP after BI-KPro surgery. IOP measurements using the telemetric Eyemate-IO sensor showed a satisfactory agreement with those of finger palpations by 2 experts. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Enders, PhilipUNSPECIFIEDorcid.org/0000-0002-9527-4957UNSPECIFIED
Hall, JonathanUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Bornhauser, MarcoUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Mansouri, KawehUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Altay, LebrizUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Schrader, StefanUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Dietlein, Thomas S.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Bachmann, Bjoern O.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Neuhann, ThomasUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Cursiefen, ClausUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-132015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.02.025
Journal or Publication Title: Am. J. Ophthalmol.
Volume: 206
Page Range: S. 256 - 264
Date: 2019
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Place of Publication: NEW YORK
ISSN: 1879-1891
Language: English
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
VISUAL OUTCOMES; GLAUCOMA; TYPE-1; COMPLICATIONS; IMPLANTATION; RETENTION; RABBITS; SHUNTSMultiple languages
OphthalmologyMultiple languages
Refereed: Yes
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/13201

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item