Sultan, Arian, Bellmann, Barbara ORCID: 0000-0001-7395-9376, Lueker, Jakob, Plenge, Tobias, van den Bruck, Jan-Hendrik, Filipovic, Karlo, Erlhoefer, Susanne, Kuffer, Liz, Arica, Zeynep and Steven, Daniel (2019). The use of a high-resolution mapping system may facilitate standard clinical practice in VE and VT ablation. J. Interv. Card. Electrophysiol., 55 (3). S. 287 - 296. DORDRECHT: SPRINGER. ISSN 1572-8595

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Background First experiences using a 64-electrode mini-basket catheter (BC) paired with an automatic mapping system (Rhythmia (TM)) for catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular ectopy (VE) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) have been reported. Objectives We aimed to evaluate (1) differences in ventricular access for the BC and (2) benefit of this technology in the setting of standard clinical practice. Methods Patients (pts) undergoing CA for VE or VT using the Intellamap Orion (TM) paired with the Rhythmia (TM) automated-mapping system were included in this study. For LV access, transseptal and retrograde access were compared. Results All 32 pts (29 men, age 63 +/- 15 years) underwent CA for VE (17 pts) or VT (15 pts). For mapping of VE originating from the left ventricle (LV) in 10 out of 13 pts, a transaortic access was feasible. The predominant access for CA of VT was transaortic (5/7). Feasibility and safety seem to be equal. The total procedure time was 179.1 +/- 21.2 min for VE ablation and 212.0 +/- 71.7 min for VT ablation (p = 0.177). For VE, an acquisition of 1602 +/- 1672 map points and annotation of 140 +/- 98 automated mapping points sufficed to abolish VE in all pts. During a 6-month follow-up (FU) after CA for VE, a VE burden reduction from 18.5 +/- 2.1% to 2.8 +/- 2.2% (p = 0.019) was achieved. In VT pts, one patient showed recurrence of sustained VT episodes during FU. Conclusion Use of a high-resolution mapping system for VE/VT CA potentially facilitates revelation of VE origin and VT circuits in the setting of standard clinical practice. Feasibility and safety of a venous, transaortic, transseptal, or a combined approach seem to be equal.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Sultan, ArianUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Bellmann, BarbaraUNSPECIFIEDorcid.org/0000-0001-7395-9376UNSPECIFIED
Lueker, JakobUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Plenge, TobiasUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
van den Bruck, Jan-HendrikUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Filipovic, KarloUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Erlhoefer, SusanneUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Kuffer, LizUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Arica, ZeynepUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Steven, DanielUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-143520
DOI: 10.1007/s10840-019-00530-1
Journal or Publication Title: J. Interv. Card. Electrophysiol.
Volume: 55
Number: 3
Page Range: S. 287 - 296
Date: 2019
Publisher: SPRINGER
Place of Publication: DORDRECHT
ISSN: 1572-8595
Language: English
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
VENTRICULAR-TACHYCARDIA; CATHETER ABLATION; PREVENTION; FORCEMultiple languages
Cardiac & Cardiovascular SystemsMultiple languages
Refereed: Yes
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/14352

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item