Zack, F., Zinka, B., Beckmann, M. W., Banaschak, S., Fischer, H., Gabriel, P., Gerber, B., Costa, S. D., Ledwon, P., Schwenzer, T. and Buettner, A. (2019). Venous air embolismdue to vaginal injuries through sexual intercourse. Critical analysis and review of the literature on frequency and diagnostics. Rechtsmedizin, 29 (1). S. 21 - 30. NEW YORK: SPRINGER. ISSN 1434-5196

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

BackgroundIn acriminal trial in Germany in 2013, amedical expert nominated by the defence stated in the appeal trial the controversially discussed opinion that awoman had died from an air embolism due to vaginal intercourse with exclusively penile penetration and injury to the vaginal wall. This diagnosis had been established by the expert based on histological examination of the lungs and vaginal injuries years after the womans death.ObjectiveThe frequency of the diagnosis air embolism as a result of vaginal injuries due to intravaginal intercourse and the modality of the diagnosis were reviewed.Material and methodsAselective literature review was performed. Furthermore, questionnaires were sent to all forensic medical institutes and to directors and chief physicians of gynecological clinics of large cities in Germany.ResultsIn the literature two case reports could be found, which by critical analysis showed significant errors in the diagnosis according to the state of science at the time of publication. In over 300,000 autopsies performed between 1990 and 2016, the 26forensic medical institutes in Germany, which had answered the questionnaire, had never diagnosed air embolism as a result of vaginal injuries due to intravaginal intercourse. All 32professionally experienced gynecologists who responded to the questionnaire had never in their career treated survived or fatal cases of air embolism after vaginal injuries through sexual intercourse or had knowledge of them.ConclusionAccording to the survey and critical analysis of the very few published case reports, there is no evidence for adiagnosis of the cause of death as air embolism after vaginal injuries. When diagnosing a fatal venous air embolism, scientific standards should be strictly followed. Adiagnosis made solely by histological examination was and is not possible according to the state of the art in forensic medicine and thus violates the principles of expert medical opinions.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Zack, F.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Zinka, B.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Beckmann, M. W.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Banaschak, S.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Fischer, H.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Gabriel, P.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Gerber, B.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Costa, S. D.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Ledwon, P.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Schwenzer, T.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Buettner, A.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-158418
DOI: 10.1007/s00194-018-0290-2
Journal or Publication Title: Rechtsmedizin
Volume: 29
Number: 1
Page Range: S. 21 - 30
Date: 2019
Publisher: SPRINGER
Place of Publication: NEW YORK
ISSN: 1434-5196
Language: German
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
OROGENITAL SEX; CESAREAN-SECTION; DEATH; INSUFFLATION; PREGNANCY; INFUSION; TRAUMAMultiple languages
Medicine, LegalMultiple languages
Refereed: Yes
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/15841

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item