Rosa, Luis . Suspending judgment the correct way. Inquiry-Interdiscip. J. Philos.. ABINGDON: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. ISSN 1502-3923

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

In this paper I present reasons for us to accept the hypothesis that suspended judgment has correctness conditions, just like beliefs do. Roughly put, the idea is that suspended judgment about p is correct when both p and not sign p might be true in view of certain facts that characterize the subject's situation. The reasons to accept that hypothesis are broadly theoretical ones: it adds unifying power to our epistemological theories, it delivers good and conservative consequences, and it allows us to assess processes of reasoning involving attitudes of suspended judgment.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Rosa, LuisUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-310867
DOI: 10.1080/0020174X.2020.1850344
Journal or Publication Title: Inquiry-Interdiscip. J. Philos.
Publisher: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
Place of Publication: ABINGDON
ISSN: 1502-3923
Language: English
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
AGNOSTICISMMultiple languages
Ethics; PhilosophyMultiple languages
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/31086

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item