Universität zu Köln

Heimann, S. M., Vehreschild, M. J. G. T., Meintker, L., Heinz, W., Schroeder, T., von Bergwelt-Baildon, M., Cornely, O. A. and Vehreschild, J. J. (2014). Different doses of micafungin for prophylaxis of invasive fungal diseases in hemato-oncological high-risk patients: a web-based non-interventional trial in four large university hospitals in Germany. Transpl. Infect. Dis., 16 (6). S. 968 - 975. HOBOKEN: WILEY. ISSN 1399-3062

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

IntroductionTreatment indications of new antifungals in clinical practice often deviate from the strict criteria used in controlled clinical trials. Under routine clinical conditions, beneficial and adverse effects, not previously described in clinical trials may be observed. The aim of this study was to describe customary prescription and treatment strategies of micafungin (MCFG). MethodsA registry was set up on and physicians were invited to provide retrospective information on cases they had treated with MCFG. Documentation comprised demographic information, underlying disease, effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of MCFG. ResultsA total of 125 episodes of patients hospitalized between September 2009 and February 2012 were documented, of which 7 had to be excluded because of incomplete documentation. The most common risk factors of patients were hematological malignancy (n=116, 98.3%) and antibiotic treatment >3days (n=115, 97.5%). MCFG was administered as prophylaxis in 106 (89.9%) patients. Median duration of MCFG application as prophylaxis was 21days (range: 3-78); 53 of the patients (50%) received a dose of 50mg, while the other 53 (50%) received 100mg/day. For the different doses, prophylactic outcome was rated as success in 42 (79.2%) vs. 52 (98.1%; P=0.004) patients. Fifty-five patients (51.9%) were treated with posaconazole before initiation of MCFG. Four patients (7.5%) developed a proven invasive fungal disease (IFD) while being treated with 50mg MCFG, compared to no patient treated with 100mg (P=0.118). At the end of MCFG prophylaxis, 24 (22.6%) patients were switched to fluconazole and 64 (60.3%) patients to posaconazole. ConclusionOur study shows clinical effectiveness of MCFG prophylaxis with low rates of breakthrough fungal infections. In most cases, MCFG was part of a multi-modal antifungal prophylactic strategy. Investigators reported fewer proven IFDs in patients receiving therapeutic doses of MCFG as prophylaxis.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID ORCID Put Code Heimann, S. M. UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Vehreschild, M. J. G. T. UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Meintker, L. UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Heinz, W. UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Schroeder, T. UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED von Bergwelt-Baildon, M. UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Cornely, O. A. UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Vehreschild, J. J. UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED
URN:	urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-422917
DOI:	10.1111/tid.12305
Journal or Publication Title:	Transpl. Infect. Dis.
Volume:	16
Number:	6
Page Range:	S. 968 - 975
Date:	2014
Publisher:	WILEY
Place of Publication:	HOBOKEN
ISSN:	1399-3062
Language:	English
Faculty:	Unspecified
Divisions:	Unspecified
Subjects:	no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Keywords Language CELL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS; ANTIFUNGAL PROPHYLAXIS; NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS; PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS; TREATMENT COST; EPIDEMIOLOGY; INFECTIONS; ASPERGILLOSIS; POSACONAZOLE; FLUCONAZOLE Multiple languages Immunology; Infectious Diseases; Transplantation Multiple languages
URI:	http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/42291