Wehmeyer, Laura, Schueller, Thomas, Kiess, Jana, Heiden, Petra, Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle, Baldermann, Juan Carlos and Andrade, Pablo (2021). Target-Specific Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation for Tourette Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Neurol., 12. LAUSANNE: FRONTIERS MEDIA SA. ISSN 1664-2295

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Background: Extended research has pointed to the efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in treatment of patients with treatment-refractory Tourette syndrome (TS). The four most commonly used DBS targets for TS include the centromedian nucleus-nucleus ventrooralis internus (CM-Voi) and the centromedian nucleus-parafascicular (CM-Pf) complexes of the thalamus, and the posteroventrolateral (pvIGPi) and the anteromedial portion of the globus pallidus internus (amGPi). Differences and commonalities between those targets need to be compared systematically.</p> <br></p> Objective: Therefore, we evaluated whether DBS is effective in reducing TS symptoms and target-specific differences.</p> Methods: A PubMed literature search was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Eligible literature was used to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p> <br></p> Results: In total, 65 studies with 376 patients were included. Overall, Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) scores were reduced by more than 50 in 69% of the patients. DBS also resulted in significant reductions of secondary outcome measures, including the total YGTSS, modified Rush Video-Based Tic Rating Scale (mRVRS), Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS), and Becks Depression Inventory (BDI). All targets resulted in significant reductions of YGTSS scores and, with the exception of the CM-Pf, also in reduced YBOCS scores. Interestingly, DBS of pallidal targets showed increased YGTSS and YBOCS reductions compared to thalamic targets. Also, the meta-analysis including six randomized controlled and double-blinded trials demonstrated clinical efficacy of DBS for TS, that remained significant for GPi but not thalamic stimulation in two separate meta-analyses.</p> <br></p> Conclusion: We conclude that DBS is a clinically effective treatment option for patients with treatment-refractory TS, with all targets showing comparable improvement rates. Future research might focus on personalized and symptom-specific target selection.</p>

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Wehmeyer, LauraUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Schueller, ThomasUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Kiess, JanaUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Heiden, PetraUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Visser-Vandewalle, VeerleUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Baldermann, Juan CarlosUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Andrade, PabloUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-565468
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.769275
Journal or Publication Title: Front. Neurol.
Volume: 12
Date: 2021
Publisher: FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
Place of Publication: LAUSANNE
ISSN: 1664-2295
Language: English
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
GLOBUS-PALLIDUS INTERNUS; LONG-TERM; DOUBLE-BLIND; THALAMIC-STIMULATION; NUCLEUS-ACCUMBENS; ANTEROMEDIAL GPI; BASAL GANGLIA; TICS; PATIENT; TRIALMultiple languages
Clinical Neurology; NeurosciencesMultiple languages
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/56546

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item