Universität zu Köln

Rassweiler-Seyfried, Marie-Claire, Otto, Corinna, Haneder, Stefan, Riffel, Philipp, Stein, Johannes and Ritter, Manuel (2021). Impact of Multiparametric Stone Measurement in Noncontrast Computer Tomography on Ureterorenoscopic Stone Removal. Urol.Int., 105 (7-8). S. 600 - 605. BASEL: KARGER. ISSN 1423-0399

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Purpose: Low-dose computer tomography (NCCT) is the standard imaging modality for patients with acute flank pain with a suspicion of urolithiasis. The stone size is usually measured 2D by a radiologist. We compared 3D stone measurement using different windows to the 2D measurement and evaluated the clinical impact on ureterorenoscopic stone removal (URS). Methods: One hundred sixty-four patients (201 stones) with a preoperative NCCT, following a URS within 4 weeks, were included in this study. Stone location, number and size of stones, operating time, and laser lithotripsy were documented. Stones were measured in 3D using bone and soft tissue window. The maximum diameter was compared to the radiological report. The U test, Kruskal-Wallis, and regression were used for statistical analyses. Results: Almost two-thirds (64.68%; 130 stones) of stone measurements in 3D with the bone window were lower than the radiologist reports in 2D. One-third (34.83%; 70 stones) of stone measurements were higher and 0.5% (1 stone) reported the same size. Using the 3D soft tissue window, 81.09% (163 stones), 17.91% (37 stones), and 1% (2 stones) of stones were measured bigger, smaller, or had the same measurement results, respectively. In the clinical setting, we could calculate a cutoff for laser lithotripsy at a maximum stone diameter of 5.70 mm (p < 0.01) with the 3D and 6.01 mm with the 2D measurements, respectively, and found a significant correlation between maximum stone diameter and operating time (p < 0.01) and number of stones and operating time (p < 0.01 with and p = 0.02 without laser). Conclusion: 3D stone measurement with bone window seems to be more accurate than 2D measurement, but 2D is sufficient for planning stone treatment. (c) 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel

Item Type:	Journal Article
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID ORCID Put Code Rassweiler-Seyfried, Marie-Claire UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Otto, Corinna UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Haneder, Stefan UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Riffel, Philipp UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Stein, Johannes UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Ritter, Manuel UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED
URN:	urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-583606
DOI:	10.1159/000515646
Journal or Publication Title:	Urol.Int.
Volume:	105
Number:	7-8
Page Range:	S. 600 - 605
Date:	2021
Publisher:	KARGER
Place of Publication:	BASEL
ISSN:	1423-0399
Language:	English
Faculty:	Unspecified
Divisions:	Unspecified
Subjects:	no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Keywords Language DOSE CT; PASSAGE; SIZE Multiple languages Urology & Nephrology Multiple languages
URI:	http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/58360