Ashton, N. J., Leuzy, A., Karikari, T. K., Mattsson-Carlgren, N., Dodich, A., Boccardi, M., Corre, J., Drzezga, A., Nordberg, A., Ossenkoppele, R., Zetterberg, H., Blennow, K., Frisoni, G. B., Garibotto, V. and Hansson, O. (2021). The validation status of blood biomarkers of amyloid and phospho-tau assessed with the 5-phase development framework for AD biomarkers. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging, 48 (7). S. 2140 - 2157. NEW YORK: SPRINGER. ISSN 1619-7089

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Purpose The development of blood biomarkers that reflect Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathophysiology (phosphorylated tau and amyloid-beta) has offered potential as scalable tests for dementia differential diagnosis and early detection. In 2019, the Geneva AD Biomarker Roadmap Initiative included blood biomarkers in the systematic validation of AD biomarkers. Methods A panel of experts convened in November 2019 at a two-day workshop in Geneva. The level of maturity (fully achieved, partly achieved, preliminary evidence, not achieved, unsuccessful) of blood biomarkers was assessed based on the Biomarker Roadmap methodology and discussed fully during the workshop which also evaluated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) biomarkers. Results Plasma p-tau has shown analytical validity (phase 2 primary aim 1) and first evidence of clinical validity (phase 3 primary aim 1), whereas the maturity level for A beta remains to be partially achieved. Full and partial achievement has been assigned to p-tau and A beta, respectively, in their associations to ante-mortem measures (phase 2 secondary aim 2). However, only preliminary evidence exists for the influence of covariates, assay comparison and cut-off criteria. Conclusions Despite the relative infancy of blood biomarkers, in comparison to CSF biomarkers, much has already been achieved for phases 1 through 3 - with p-tau having greater success in detecting AD and predicting disease progression. However, sufficient data about the effect of covariates on the biomarker measurement is lacking. No phase 4 (real-world performance) or phase 5 (assessment of impact/cost) aim has been tested, thus not achieved.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Ashton, N. J.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Leuzy, A.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Karikari, T. K.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Mattsson-Carlgren, N.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Dodich, A.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Boccardi, M.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Corre, J.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Drzezga, A.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Nordberg, A.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Ossenkoppele, R.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Zetterberg, H.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Blennow, K.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Frisoni, G. B.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Garibotto, V.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Hansson, O.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-604728
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05253-y
Journal or Publication Title: Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging
Volume: 48
Number: 7
Page Range: S. 2140 - 2157
Date: 2021
Publisher: SPRINGER
Place of Publication: NEW YORK
ISSN: 1619-7089
Language: English
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical ImagingMultiple languages
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/60472

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item