Meuleman, Bart ORCID: 0000-0002-0384-5995, Zoltak, Tomasz, Pokropek, Artur ORCID: 0000-0002-5899-2917, Davidov, Eldad ORCID: 0000-0002-3396-969X, Muthen, Bengt, Oberski, Daniel L., Billiet, Jaak and Schmidt, Peter . Why Measurement Invariance is Important in Comparative Research. A Response to Welzel et al. (2021). Sociol. Methods. Res.. THOUSAND OAKS: SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC. ISSN 1552-8294

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Welzel et al. (2021) claim that non-invariance of instruments is inconclusive and inconsequential in the field for cross-cultural value measurement. In this response, we contend that several key arguments on which Welzel et al. (2021) base their critique of invariance testing are conceptually and statistically incorrect. First, Welzel et al. (2021) claim that value measurement follows a formative rather than reflective logic. Yet they do not provide sufficient theoretical arguments for this conceptualization, nor do they discuss the disadvantages of this approach for validation of instruments. Second, their claim that strong inter-item correlations cannot be retrieved when means are close to the endpoint of scales ignores the existence of factor-analytic approaches for ordered-categorical indicators. Third, Welzel et al. (2021) propose that rather than of relying on invariance tests, comparability can be assessed by studying the connection with theoretically related constructs. However, their proposal ignores that external validation through nomological linkages hinges on the assumption of comparability. By means of two examples, we illustrate that violating the assumptions of measurement invariance can distort conclusions substantially. Following the advice of Welzel et al. (2021) implies discarding a tool that has proven to be very useful for comparativists.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Meuleman, BartUNSPECIFIEDorcid.org/0000-0002-0384-5995UNSPECIFIED
Zoltak, TomaszUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Pokropek, ArturUNSPECIFIEDorcid.org/0000-0002-5899-2917UNSPECIFIED
Davidov, EldadUNSPECIFIEDorcid.org/0000-0002-3396-969XUNSPECIFIED
Muthen, BengtUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Oberski, Daniel L.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Billiet, JaakUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Schmidt, PeterUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-690557
DOI: 10.1177/00491241221091755
Journal or Publication Title: Sociol. Methods. Res.
Publisher: SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
Place of Publication: THOUSAND OAKS
ISSN: 1552-8294
Language: English
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
EQUIVALENCE; CONSTRUCTS; VALUES; MODEL; BIASMultiple languages
Social Sciences, Mathematical Methods; SociologyMultiple languages
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/69055

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item