Bremm, Johannes ORCID: 0000-0002-6081-1070, Henze, Jörn, Dratsch, Thomas ORCID: 0000-0003-4014-7763, Kloeckner, Roman, Maintz, David ORCID: 0000-0002-8942-3776 and dos Santos, Daniel Pinto ORCID: 0000-0003-4785-6394 (2025). CT-angiography in acute bleeding: Is a non-enhanced scan necessary? European Journal of Radiology, 187. pp. 1-5. Elsevier. ISSN 0720048X

[thumbnail of 1-s2.0-S0720048X25001986-main.pdf] PDF
1-s2.0-S0720048X25001986-main.pdf
Bereitstellung unter der CC-Lizenz: Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (2MB)
Identification Number:10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112112

Abstract

[Artikel-Nr.: 112112] Objective: In clinical routine CT-angiography is frequently used to detect hemorrhage and to locate its source. Many centers use a triple phase protocol consisting of non-contrast, arterial and portal venous phase scan. The aim of this study was to clarify the added value of the non-contrast CT scan in detection of hemorrhage and to provide evidence for or against its usage. Materials & Methods: We retrospectively included all patients between 2014 and 2020 who underwent triphasic CT angiography for suspected bleeding and interventional angiography within 6 h of CT confirming bleeding. Two experienced observers re-evaluated all CT scans and established consensus on whether the bleeding could confidently be detected without the non-enhanced CT scan. Additionally, we recorded data on radiation exposure. Results: We included 75 patients (44 male, 31 female, median age 64 years) in the final dataset. Of all bleedings 33 (43 %) were GI bleedings. After consensus reading, non-enhanced CT scan was deemed helpful in only 3 cases (5.2 %) with all of these being GI bleeding. Non-enhanced series contributed substantially to the overall radiation exposure (mean DLPnon contrast 927.9 mGy*cm, mean DLParterial 631.3 mGy*cm, mean DLPportal venous 915.0 mGy*cm). Conclusion: Our results suggest that in the vast majority of cases non-contrast CT is not necessary to detect hemorrhage. Omission of non-enhanced CT scans results in relevant dose reduction. However, in few cases non- contrast scan can be helpful to exclude false positive findings in particular in suspected gastrointestinal bleeding.

Item Type: Article
Creators:
Creators
Email
ORCID
ORCID Put Code
Bremm, Johannes
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
Henze, Jörn
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
Dratsch, Thomas
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
Kloeckner, Roman
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
Maintz, David
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
dos Santos, Daniel Pinto
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-803524
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112112
Journal or Publication Title: European Journal of Radiology
Volume: 187
Page Range: pp. 1-5
Number of Pages: 5
Date: June 2025
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 0720048X
Language: English
Faculty: Faculty of Medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Radiologische Diagnostik > Institut und Poliklinik für Radiologische Diagnostik
Subjects: Medical sciences Medicine
Uncontrolled Keywords:
Keywords
Language
Tomography, computed ; Acute bleeding ; Non-enhanced scan ; Radiation exposure
English
['eprint_fieldname_oa_funders' not defined]: Publikationsfonds UzK
Refereed: Yes
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/80352

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item