Baethge, Christopher ORCID: 0000-0001-6246-3674 and Jergas, Hannah ORCID: 0000-0003-3041-1583 (2025). Systematic review and meta-analysis of quotation inaccuracy in medicine. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 10 (1). pp. 1-10. Springer Nature. ISSN 2058-8615

[thumbnail of s41073-025-00173-z.pdf] PDF
s41073-025-00173-z.pdf
Bereitstellung unter der CC-Lizenz: Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB)
Identification Number:10.1186/s41073-025-00173-z

Abstract

[Artikel-Nr.: 13] Background: Quotations are crucial to science but have been shown to be often inaccurate. Quotation errors, that is, a reference not supporting the authors’ claim, may still be a significant issue in scientific medical writing. This study aimed to examine the quotation error rate and trends over time in the medical literature. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and reference lists for quotation error studies in medicine and without date or language restrictions identified 46 studies analyzing 32,000 quotations/references. Literature search, data extraction, and risk of bias assessments were performed independently by two raters. Random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regression were used to analyze error rates and trends (protocol pre-registered on OSF). Results: 16.9% (95% CI: 14.1%-20.0%) of quotations were incorrect, with approximately half classified as major errors (8.0% [95% CI: 6.4%-10.0%]). Heterogeneity was high, and Egger’s test for small study effects remained negative throughout. Meta-regression showed no significant improvement in quotation accuracy over recent years (slope: -0.002 [95% CI: -0.03 to 0.02], p = 0.85). Neither risk of bias, nor the number of references were statistically significantly associated with total error rate, but journal impact factor was: Spearman’s ρ = –0.253 ( p = 0.043, binomial test, N = 25). Conclusions: Quotation errors remain a problem in the medical literature, with no improvement over time. Addressing this issue requires concerted efforts to improve scholarly practices and editorial processes.

Item Type: Article
Creators:
Creators
Email
ORCID
ORCID Put Code
Baethge, Christopher
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
Jergas, Hannah
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-809311
Identification Number: 10.1186/s41073-025-00173-z
Journal or Publication Title: Research Integrity and Peer Review
Volume: 10
Number: 1
Page Range: pp. 1-10
Number of Pages: 10
Date: 23 July 2025
Publisher: Springer Nature
ISSN: 2058-8615
Language: English
Faculty: Faculty of Medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Neurologie > Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie
Faculty of Medicine > Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie > Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
Subjects: Medical sciences Medicine
Uncontrolled Keywords:
Keywords
Language
Quotation inaccuracy ; Citation errors ; Secondary quotations ; Quotation errors ; Medical publishing
English
['eprint_fieldname_oa_funders' not defined]: Publikationsfonds UzK
Refereed: Yes
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/80931

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item