Universität zu Köln

Porth, Elisa ORCID: 0000-0001-5461-302X, Mattes, André ORCID: 0000-0002-4821-8012 and Stahl, Jutta ORCID: 0000-0002-3252-180X (2024). Motor inhibition errors and interference suppression errors differ systematically on neural and behavioural features of response monitoring. Scientific Reports, 14 (1). pp. 1-17. Springer Nature. ISSN 2045-2322

PDF s41598-024-66364-8.pdf Bereitstellung unter der CC-Lizenz: Creative Commons Attribution. Download (3MB)

Abstract

[Artikel-Nr.: 15966] Abstract: Action inhibition and error commission are prominent in everyday life. Inhibition comprises at least two facets: motor inhibition and interference suppression. When motor inhibition fails, a strong response impulse cannot be inhibited. When interference suppression fails, we become distracted by irrelevant stimuli. We investigated the neural and behavioural similarities and differences between motor inhibition errors and interference suppression errors systematically from stimulus-onset to post-response adaptation. To enable a direct comparison between both error types, we developed a complex speeded choice task where we assessed the error types in two perceptually similar conditions. Comparing the error types along the processing stream showed that the P2, an early component in the event-related potential associated with sensory gating, is the first marker for differences between the two error types. Further error-specific variations were found for the parietal P3 (associated with context updating and attentional resource allocation), for the lateralized readiness potential (LRP, associated with primary motor cortex activity), and for the P e (associated with error evidence accumulation). For motor inhibition errors, the P2, P3 and P e tended to be enhanced compared to successful inhibition. The LRP for motor inhibition errors was marked by multiple small response impulses. For interference suppression errors, all components were more similar to those of successful inhibition. Together, these findings suggest that motor inhibition errors arise from a deficient early inhibitory process at the perceptual and motor level, and become more apparent than interference suppression errors, that arise from an impeded response selection process.

Item Type:	Article
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID ORCID Put Code Porth, Elisa UNSPECIFIED https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5461-302X UNSPECIFIED Mattes, André UNSPECIFIED https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4821-8012 UNSPECIFIED Stahl, Jutta UNSPECIFIED https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3252-180X UNSPECIFIED
URN:	urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-814570
Identification Number:	10.1038/s41598-024-66364-8
Journal or Publication Title:	Scientific Reports
Volume:	14
Number:	1
Page Range:	pp. 1-17
Number of Pages:	17
Date:	10 July 2024
Publisher:	Springer Nature
ISSN:	2045-2322
Language:	English
Faculty:	Faculty of Human Sciences
Divisions:	Faculty of Human Sciences > Department Psychologie
Subjects:	Psychology
['eprint_fieldname_oa_funders' not defined]:	Publikationsfonds UzK
Refereed:	Yes
URI:	http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/81457