Buerger, Martin, Kasper, Philipp, Allo, Gabriel, Gillessen, Johannes and Schramm, Christoph (2019). Ileal intubation is not associated with higher detection rate of right-sided conventional adenomas and serrated polyps compared to cecal intubation after adjustment for overall adenoma detection rate. BMC Gastroenterol., 19 (1). LONDON: BMC. ISSN 1471-230X

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Background High cecal intubation rate (CIR) is associated with significant improved adenoma detection rate (ADR), however, self-reported CIR may be overestimated and inadequate documentation of cecal intubation is associated with a lower polyp detection rate compared to clear documentation. We aimed to investigate if ileal intubation may be associated with higher detection rates (DR) for right-sided conventional adenomas (cAD) and serrated polyps (SP) compared to cecal intubation in a large screening colonoscopy cohort. Material and methods Retrospective analysis of individuals >= 50 years with average risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) who underwent screening colonoscopy between 01/01/2012 and 14/12/2016 at a tertiary academic hospital and six community-based private practices. Exclusion criteria were conditions with increased risk for CRC (e.g. inflammatory bowel disease, history of CRC, hereditary cancer syndromes), previous colonoscopy at the same institution, and incomplete procedures. Right-sided colon was defined as caecum and ascending colon. Results 4.138 individuals were analysed (mean age 62 years, 52.1% female). DR for right-sided cADs and SPs were significantly higher after ileal compared to cecal intubation in univariate (12.5% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.001, and 6.3% vs. 3.3%, p < 0.001), but not in multivariate analysis (OR 1.025, 95%-CI 0.639-1.646, p = 0.918, and OR 0.937, 95%-CI 0.671-1.309, p = 0.704). DRs did not differ between ileal and cecal intubation for endoscopists with ADR >= 25 and < 25%, respectively. ADR >= 25% was significantly associated with ileal intubation (OR 21.862, 95%-CI 18.049-26.481, p < 0.001). Conclusion Ileal intubation may not provide any benefit over cecal intubation concerning the detection of cADs and SPs in the right-sided colon.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Buerger, MartinUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Kasper, PhilippUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Allo, GabrielUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Gillessen, JohannesUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Schramm, ChristophUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-127536
DOI: 10.1186/s12876-019-1111-0
Journal or Publication Title: BMC Gastroenterol.
Volume: 19
Number: 1
Date: 2019
Publisher: BMC
Place of Publication: LONDON
ISSN: 1471-230X
Language: English
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
COLORECTAL-CANCER; PROXIMAL COLON; ASSISTED COLONOSCOPY; RISK-FACTORS; MISS RATE; RETROFLEXION; IMPACT; 2NDMultiple languages
Gastroenterology & HepatologyMultiple languages
Refereed: Yes
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/12753

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item