van Damme, Maike ORCID: 0000-0003-1080-9789 and Dykstra, Pearl ORCID: 0000-0003-1518-1476 (2018). Spousal resources and relationship quality in eight European countries. Community Work Fam., 21 (5). S. 541 - 564. ABINGDON: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. ISSN 1469-3615

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

We relate relationship satisfaction and thoughts about leaving a romantic relationship to a couple's relative and absolute resources and check for context-dependency of those associations. Our theoretical point of departure is that the more resources women have compared to their spouses, the higher their intra-household bargaining power to negotiate themselves out of unpleasant tasks, particularly in gender-egalitarian and very income equal and unequal societies. In traditional societies (which score low on the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM)), the inflexible role of men within the household presumably prevents women from bargaining a better position, which in turn negatively affects relationship quality. Income equality (low GINI coefficient) may be a prerequisite for women's bargaining position, where more inequality (mid-GINI) may be detrimental for it. Nevertheless, extreme income inequality (high GINI) may again be favorable for women's relationship power. Using country fixed effects models on data from the Generations and Gender Surveys (GGS), we compare men and women who are in a couple (formed after 1995) for eight European countries. We find that absolute resources matter more than relative resources, at least for relationship satisfaction: Higher educated couples are more satisfied with their relationships, which could suggest lower stress levels in those couples (in more traditional contexts). Second, we observe GINI context-dependency of the association between relative education and relationship satisfaction for women and relative education and exit thoughts for men, although opposite to what we expected. Perhaps reference group theory or gender display theory can explain these unexpected results. Finally, we find that women have more break-up plans in societies with a lower score on GEM. This last result is consistent with the notion that bargaining only works in egalitarian contexts.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
van Damme, MaikeUNSPECIFIEDorcid.org/0000-0003-1080-9789UNSPECIFIED
Dykstra, PearlUNSPECIFIEDorcid.org/0000-0003-1518-1476UNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-199672
DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2018.1526776
Journal or Publication Title: Community Work Fam.
Volume: 21
Number: 5
Page Range: S. 541 - 564
Date: 2018
Publisher: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
Place of Publication: ABINGDON
ISSN: 1469-3615
Language: English
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
MARITAL SATISFACTION; ECONOMIC DEPENDENCY; WOMENS EMPLOYMENT; DOMESTIC LABOR; GENDER; DIVISION; HOUSEWORK; WIVES; MARRIAGES; FAIRNESSMultiple languages
SociologyMultiple languages
Refereed: Yes
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/19967

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item