Universität zu Köln

Neudorfer, Clemens, Hunsche, Stefan, Hellmich, Martin, El Majdoub, Faycal and Maarouf, Mohammad (2018). Comparative Study of Robot-Assisted versus Conventional Frame-Based Deep Brain Stimulation Stereotactic Neurosurgery. Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg., 96 (5). S. 327 - 335. BASEL: KARGER. ISSN 1423-0372

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Background/Aims: Technological advancements had a serious impact on the evolution of robotic systems in stereotactic neurosurgery over the last three decades and may turn robot-assisted stereotactic neurosurgery into a sophisticated alternative to purely mechanical guiding devices. Objectives: To compare robot-assisted and conventional frame-based deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery with regard to accuracy, precision, reliability, duration of surgery, intraoperative imaging quality, safety and maintenance using a standardized setup. Methods: Retrospective evaluation of 80 consecutive patients was performed who underwent DBS surgery using either a frame-based mechanical stereotactic guiding device (n = 40) or a stereotactic robot (ROSA Brain, MedTech, Montpellier, France) (n = 40). Results: The mean accuracy of robot-assisted and conventional lead implantation was 0.76 mm (SD: 0.37 mm, range: 0.17-1.52 mm) and 1.11 mm (SD: 0.59 mm, range: 0.10-2.90 mm), respectively. We observed a statistically significant difference in accuracy (p < 0.001) when comparing lateral deviations between both modalities. Furthermore, a statistical significance was ob-served when investigating the proportion of values exceeding 2.00 mm between both groups (p = 0.013). In 8.75% (n = 7) of conventionally implanted leads, lateral deviations were greater than 2.0 mm. With a maximum value of 1.52 mm, this threshold was never reached during robot-guided DBS. The mean duration of DBS surgery could be reduced significantly (p < 0.001) when comparing robot-guided DBS (mean: 325.1 +/- 81.6 min) to conventional lead implantation (mean: 394.8 +/- 66.6 min). Conclusions: Robot-assisted DBS was shown to be superior to conventional lead implantation with respect to accuracy, precision and operation time. Improved quality control, continuous intraoperative monitoring and less manual adjustment likely contribute to the robotic system's reliability allowing high accuracy during lead implantation despite limited experience. Hence, robot-assisted lead implantation can be considered an appropriate and reliable alternative to purely mechanical devices. (C) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel

Item Type:	Journal Article
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID ORCID Put Code Neudorfer, Clemens UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Hunsche, Stefan UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Hellmich, Martin UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED El Majdoub, Faycal UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Maarouf, Mohammad UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED
URN:	urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-199887
DOI:	10.1159/000494736
Journal or Publication Title:	Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg.
Volume:	96
Number:	5
Page Range:	S. 327 - 335
Date:	2018
Publisher:	KARGER
Place of Publication:	BASEL
ISSN:	1423-0372
Language:	English
Faculty:	Unspecified
Divisions:	Unspecified
Subjects:	no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Keywords Language APPLICATION ACCURACY; SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS; IMPLANTATION; TOMOGRAPHY Multiple languages Neurosciences; Neuroimaging; Surgery Multiple languages
Refereed:	Yes
URI:	http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/19988