Herden, Jan ORCID: 0000-0002-1667-5200, Schwarte, Andreas, Werner, Thorsten, Behrendt, Uwe, Heidenreich, Axel and Weissbach, Lothar . Long-term outcomes of active surveillance for clinically localized prostate cancer in a community-based setting: results from a prospective non-interventional study. World J. Urol.. NEW YORK: SPRINGER. ISSN 1433-8726

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Purpose To report on long-term outcomes of patients treated with active surveillance (AS) for localized prostate cancer (PCa) in the daily routine setting. Methods HAROW (2008-2013) was a non-interventional, health service research study about the management of localized PCa in the community setting, with 86% of the study centers being office-based urologists. A follow-up examination of all patients who opted for AS as primary treatment was carried out. Overall, cancer-specific, and metastasis-free survival, as well as discontinuation rates, were determined. Results Of 329 patients, 62.9% had very-low- and 21.3% low-risk tumours. The median follow-up was 7.7 years (IQR 4.7-9.1). Twenty-eight patients (8.5%) died unrelated to PCa, of whom 19 were under AS or watchful waiting (WW). Additionally, seven patients (2.1%) developed metastasis. The estimated 10-year overall and metastasis-free survival was 86% (95% CI 81.7-90.3) and 97% (95% CI 94.6-99.3), respectively. One hundred eighty-seven patients (56.8%) discontinued AS changing to invasive treatment: 104 radical prostatectomies (RP), 55 radiotherapies (RT), and 28 hormonal treatments (HT). Another 50 patients switched to WW. Finally, 37.4% remained alive without invasive therapy (22.2% AS and 15.2% WW). Intervention-free survival differed between the risk groups: 47.8% in the very-low-, 33.8% in the low- and 34.6% in the intermediate-/high-risk-group (p = 0.008). On multivariable analysis, PSA-density >= 0.2 ng/ml(2)was significantly predictive for receiving invasive treatment (HR 2.55;p = 0.001). Conclusion Even in routine care, AS can be considered a safe treatment option. Our results might encourage office-based urologists regarding the implementation of AS and to counteract possible concerns against this treatment option.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Herden, JanUNSPECIFIEDorcid.org/0000-0002-1667-5200UNSPECIFIED
Schwarte, AndreasUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Werner, ThorstenUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Behrendt, UweUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Heidenreich, AxelUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Weissbach, LotharUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-317964
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03471-x
Journal or Publication Title: World J. Urol.
Publisher: SPRINGER
Place of Publication: NEW YORK
ISSN: 1433-8726
Language: English
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
FOLLOW-UP; SELECTION; GUIDELINES; CRITERIA; HAROWMultiple languages
Urology & NephrologyMultiple languages
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/31796

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item