Kablitz, Andreas (2020). The Controversy between Levinas and Derrida and the Methodology of Literary Studies or Why Seems Ethical Criticism to be Unavoidable? Forum World Lit. Stud., 12 (2). S. 201 - 224. HONG KONG: KNOWLEDGE HUB PUBL CO LTD. ISSN 2154-6711

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Why does literature have a basic affinity with ethical criticism? It looked as if ethical criticism had definitely disappeared form literary studies during the 20th century. However, by the end of this century, its scholarly legitimacy was reestablished. The debate between Levinas and Derrida played an important part in this revaluation of ethical criticism. This is why this paper starts off from their controversy in order to demonstrate that the ethical dimension of literature cannot be derived from any theory of ethics or whatsoever theoretical approach. The base of ethical criticism, instead, is constituted by the specific communicative conditions of literature itself as I will argue at the end of this paper.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Kablitz, AndreasUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-330975
Journal or Publication Title: Forum World Lit. Stud.
Volume: 12
Number: 2
Page Range: S. 201 - 224
Date: 2020
Publisher: KNOWLEDGE HUB PUBL CO LTD
Place of Publication: HONG KONG
ISSN: 2154-6711
Language: English
Faculty: Faculty of Arts and Humanities
Divisions: Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Fächergruppe 5: Moderne Sprachen und Kulturen > Romanisches Seminar > Petrarca-Institut
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
LiteratureMultiple languages
Refereed: Yes
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/33097

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item