Universität zu Köln

Hoeller, Inken, Teismann, Tobias, Cwik, Jan Christopher ORCID: 0000-0002-2290-353X, Glaesmer, Heide, Spangenberg, Lena, Hallensleben, Nina, Paashaus, Laura, Rath, Dajana, Schoenfelder, Antje, Juckel, Georg and Forkmann, Thomas (2020). Short defeat and entrapment scale: A psychometric investigation in three German samples. Compr. Psychiat., 98. PHILADELPHIA: W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC. ISSN 1532-8384

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Background: The present study aimed to validate the German version of the Short Defeat and Entrapment Scale (SDES). Methods: Validity and reliability were established in an online (N = 480), an outpatient (N = 277) and an inpatient sample (N = 296 ). Statistical analyses induded confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) and group differences in defeat and entrapment. Results: For the online and the inpatient sample, the CFA indicated a two-factor solution, whereas for the outpatient sample both one- and two-factor solutions fitted the data equally well. Scale properties for the two-factor solution (defeat and entrapment subscale) were excellent. Thus, further analyses were based on this solution. For the online and the outpatient sample, suicidal ideators and suicide attempters scored significantly higher in defeat and entrapment than non-ideators and non-attempters. Limitations: Limiting factors of the study were the different measures across the samples and the cross-sectional design of the study. Conclusion: Though results were partly mixed, we found support for a two-factor solution of the instrument showing excellent psychometric properties in all three samples. The two-factor solution is further expected to have higher clinical utility than a one-factor solution. Suicidal ideators and suicide attempters in the online and outpatient sample showed higher scores in defeat and entrapment than non-ideators and non-attempters, emphasizing these two concepts as predictors for suicidal ideation. All in all, the present study supports the general validity and reliability of the SDES. However, future investigations based on prospective data are warranted. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID ORCID Put Code Hoeller, Inken UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Teismann, Tobias UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Cwik, Jan Christopher UNSPECIFIED orcid.org/0000-0002-2290-353X UNSPECIFIED Glaesmer, Heide UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Spangenberg, Lena UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Hallensleben, Nina UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Paashaus, Laura UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Rath, Dajana UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Schoenfelder, Antje UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Juckel, Georg UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Forkmann, Thomas UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED
URN:	urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-339118
DOI:	10.1016/j.comppsych.2020.152160
Journal or Publication Title:	Compr. Psychiat.
Volume:	98
Date:	2020
Publisher:	W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
Place of Publication:	PHILADELPHIA
ISSN:	1532-8384
Language:	English
Faculty:	Unspecified
Divisions:	Unspecified
Subjects:	no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Keywords Language POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; SUICIDAL IDEATION; DEPRESSION; VALIDITY; ANXIETY; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION; VERSION; SCHIZOPHRENIA; METAANALYSIS Multiple languages Psychiatry Multiple languages
URI:	http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/33911