Universität zu Köln

Yates, A. B., Smith, A. M., Bertuch, F., Gehlen, B., Gramsch, B., Heinen, M., Joannes-Boyau, R., Scheffers, A., Parr, J. and Pawlik, A. (2015). Radiocarbon-dating adhesive and wooden residues from stone tools by Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS): challenges and insights encountered in a case study. J. Archaeol. Sci., 61. S. 45 - 59. LONDON: ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD. ISSN 1095-9238

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

In this study we present and assess a process to enhance archaeological residue AMS dating by focusing on contaminant confinement. The sequence of methods applied consists of: 1) optical residue and use-wear analyses, 2) experimental designs addressing cleaning treatments to mitigate impact of contaminants, 3) preparation and extraction of residues from (mostly) previously dated stone artefacts, and 4) establishing the elemental characteristics of residues by using SEM/EDX as a final step to avoid sample contamination during analyses. We found the alkaline surfactant Decon 90 is a useful solution for removal of skin scales and fabric fibre but has limited effect on graphite contamination introduced by pencil lead. Adhesive residues were not affected by Decon immersion, however, wooden residues from bog sites were partly dislodged. While the methodological sequence was in general successful and some artefact residues were dated within the anticipated age range, difficulties were encountered with other lithic residues. Some artefact residues attained AMS dates which appear to be affected by modern contaminants and other residue radiocarbon dates were seemingly affected by fossil shell derived from flint stone, plasticizers or from a fixative substance older than the fabrication and use of the artefact. One outcome from this study is that performing chemical residue identification earlier in the method sequence using non-destructive and non-contaminating methods would guide the choice of residue treatment and improve reliability of age determination. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID ORCID Put Code Yates, A. B. UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Smith, A. M. UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Bertuch, F. UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Gehlen, B. UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Gramsch, B. UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Heinen, M. UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Joannes-Boyau, R. UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Scheffers, A. UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Parr, J. UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Pawlik, A. UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED
URN:	urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-394738
DOI:	10.1016/j.jas.2015.04.022
Journal or Publication Title:	J. Archaeol. Sci.
Volume:	61
Page Range:	S. 45 - 59
Date:	2015
Publisher:	ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
Place of Publication:	LONDON
ISSN:	1095-9238
Language:	English
Faculty:	Unspecified
Divisions:	Unspecified
Subjects:	no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Keywords Language HOWIESONS POORT; SCANNING-ELECTRON; EARLY HOLOCENE; MICRO-RESIDUE; IDENTIFICATION; BITUMEN; TAR; AGE; ARTIFACTS; POLLEN Multiple languages Anthropology; Archaeology; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary Multiple languages
URI:	http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/39473