Universität zu Köln

Maxeiner, James R. (2021). The Authoritative Text as Imperative for Comprehensibility of Legislation. Zeitschrift für Europäische Rechtslinguistik (ZERL) (Sonderausgabe 2021). Köln: Universität zu Köln, Europäische Rechtslinguistik.

Preview

PDF maxeiner-2021-authoritative-imperative-legislation.pdf - Published Version Bereitstellung unter der CC-Lizenz: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (243kB) | Preview

Abstract

(Beitrag 5. Europäisches Symposium zur Verständlichkeit von Rechtsvorschriften des Bundesministeriums der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz) The most understandable of texts is of little use as law if it is not clear that it is authoritative. This is the comparative lesson of this essay. American law is—Americans say—indeterminate. American law is indeterminate because American texts, clear as they may be in wording, often are not authoritative; other texts apply too and may be inconsistent. German law is rarely indeterminate in this sense. This essay identifies in bullet-points some comparative aspects of clarity of American and German law. Why is American law indeterminate? Why is German law not? What, if anything, do these differences counsel for future European Union law? I identify five areas of differences. 1. Legal System and Statutes, 2. Lawmaking. 3. Federalism. 4. Constitutional Review and 5. Law Application.