Reinermann, Holger ORCID: 0000-0001-8628-0960 (2020). The Only Way is All the Way? The Dimensionality of Party Competition and the Functionality of the Left-Right Dimension as an Information Shortcut for Voters. PhD thesis, Universität zu Köln.
|
PDF
KUPS_Dissertation_HolgerReinermann.pdf Download (4MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This dissertation deals with a puzzle posed by how party competition and electoral behavior unfold in modern democracies: While voters are commonly thought of as relying on rather simple decision heuristics - one of them the left-right dimension - patterns of party competition, in many contexts, exhibit considerable levels of complexity. This seems to create a problem with regard to the left-right dimension: if parties compete in a multidimensional space, a single dimension should not function very well as a decision guide. I engage with this conundrum by posing three interrelated research questions: If parties compete such that their political offers cannot be summarized by a single dimension anymore, can voters still use that dimension as a reference? If they can, how exactly do they do it? Lastly, if voters decide by a unidimensional schema, how can we adjust the spatial model to reconcile this with multidimensional party competition? Based on findings in the literature and in the dissertation itself, I conclude that left-right still performs rather well as a voter heuristic. The solution I propose here for how it does that is `idiosyncratic unidimensionality', which means that each individual has a unique idea of left-right, and ignores or reinterprets issues that cross-cut this pattern. Chapter 2 and 3 examine the functionality of left-right in the face of multidimensional party competition - the former with observational, the latter with experimental data. Chapter 4 (prepared in cooperation with Berta Barbet) broadens the picture and looks at the implications of party system dimensionality for the quality of democratic representation. Chapter 5 combines the preceding chapters' findings with other conceptual and theoretical insights discussed in this dissertation and puts them to a sort of `theoretical consistency test' in an agent-based model. Kapitel 5 mit freundlicher Genehmigung von Springer Nature / Chapter 5 with kind permission by Springer Nature.
Item Type: | Thesis (PhD thesis) | ||||||||||||||
Creators: |
|
||||||||||||||
Contributors: |
|
||||||||||||||
URN: | urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-542977 | ||||||||||||||
Date: | October 2020 | ||||||||||||||
Language: | English | ||||||||||||||
Faculty: | Faculty of Management, Economy and Social Sciences | ||||||||||||||
Divisions: | Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences > Social Sciences > Political Science > Cologne Center for Comparative Politics | ||||||||||||||
Subjects: | Social sciences Political science |
||||||||||||||
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
|
||||||||||||||
Date of oral exam: | 22 March 2021 | ||||||||||||||
Referee: |
|
||||||||||||||
Refereed: | Yes | ||||||||||||||
URI: | http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/54297 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Export
Actions (login required)
View Item |