Universität zu Köln

Wenzel, Lisa, Heesen, Christoph, Scheiderbauer, Jutta, van de Loo, Markus, Koepke, Sascha and Rahn, Anne Christin (2021). Evaluation of an interactive web-based programme on relapse management for people with multiple sclerosis (POWER@MS2): study protocol for a process evaluation accompanying a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 11 (10). LONDON: BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP. ISSN 2044-6055

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Introduction Process evaluations accompanying complex interventions examine the implementation process of the underlying intervention, identify mechanisms of impact and assess contextual factors. This paper presents the protocol for a process evaluation conducted alongside the randomised controlled trial POWER@MS2. The trial comprises the evaluation of a web-based complex intervention on relapse management in 188 people with multiple sclerosis conducted in 20 centres. The web-based intervention programme focuses on relapse treatment decision making and includes a decision aid, a nurse-led webinar and an online chat. With the process evaluation presented here, we aim to assess participants' responses to and interactions with the intervention to understand how and why the intervention produces change. Methods and analysis A mixed methods design is used to explore the acceptance of the intervention as well as its use and impact on participants. Participants are people with multiple sclerosis, neurologists, nurses and stakeholders. Quantitative semistandardised evaluation forms will be collected throughout the study. Qualitative semistructured telephone interviews will be conducted at the end of the study with selected participants, especially people with multiple sclerosis and neurologists. Quantitative data will be collected and analysed descriptively. Based on the results, the qualitative interviews will be conducted and analysed thematically, and the results will be merged in a joint display table. Ethics and dissemination The process evaluation has received ethical approval from the Ethical Committee of the University of Lubeck (reference 19-024). Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, at conferences, meetings and on relevant patient websites.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID ORCID Put Code Wenzel, Lisa UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Heesen, Christoph UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Scheiderbauer, Jutta UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED van de Loo, Markus UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Koepke, Sascha UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED Rahn, Anne Christin UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED
URN:	urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-588634
DOI:	10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046874
Journal or Publication Title:	BMJ Open
Volume:	11
Number:	10
Date:	2021
Publisher:	BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
Place of Publication:	LONDON
ISSN:	2044-6055
Language:	English
Faculty:	Unspecified
Divisions:	Unspecified
Subjects:	no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Keywords Language Medicine, General & Internal Multiple languages
URI:	http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/58863