Scheele, Lisa (2017). Designing Incentive Systems for Truthful Forecast Information Sharing Within a Firm. Case Study, Theory and Experiments. PhD thesis, Universität zu Köln.
|
PDF
180207_Diss_Gesamt_einseitig.pdf - Accepted Version Download (8MB) |
Abstract
In environments with uncertain demand, companies must rely on forecasts to plan and execute their internal supply processes. A phenomenon frequently observed in practice is that demand forecasts are systematically too high. One reason could be incentive systems that motivate employees in Marketing/Sales to maximize their sales volume. In this respect, inflated demand forecasts are a means to ensure sufficient inventory and to minimize the risk of shortages. The objective of this thesis is to design incentive systems that lead to accurate and unbiased demand forecasts. We motivate and contextualize our research question by the practical case of a company in the pharmaceutical industry. To analyze the results of the case study more systematically, we transfer the forecast information exchange into a game-theoretic model. In an environment with stochastic demand, a (better informed) Sales department sends a forecast to an Operations department. To incentivize truthful forecast information sharing, the incentive system of Sales contains a penalty for forecast errors. The utility functions are grounded in behavioral theories of mental accounting, loss aversion and lying aversion. We formalize the setting as a signaling game and derive the Pareto-dominant separating equilibria of the game. In laboratory experiments, we observe behavior that deviates substantially from expected-payoff-maximizing behavior in the directions predicted by our behavioral model. Based on our theory and estimates for the behavioral parameters of our model, we design forecast-error-based incentive systems for truthful forecast information sharing. We validate their effectiveness in a new experiment with out-of-sample treatments and out-of-sample subjects. We further confirm the robustness of our model by additional experiments and analyses.
Item Type: | Thesis (PhD thesis) | ||||||||
Creators: |
|
||||||||
URN: | urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-80522 | ||||||||
Date: | 27 October 2017 | ||||||||
Language: | English | ||||||||
Faculty: | Faculty of Management, Economy and Social Sciences | ||||||||
Divisions: | Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences | ||||||||
Subjects: | Management and auxiliary services | ||||||||
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
|
||||||||
Date of oral exam: | 1 February 2018 | ||||||||
Referee: |
|
||||||||
Refereed: | Yes | ||||||||
URI: | http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/8052 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Export
Actions (login required)
View Item |