Semmler, Carolin ORCID: 0000-0002-5784-0735, Wunderle, Veronika ORCID: 0009-0008-0389-9230, Kuzu, Taylan D. ORCID: 0000-0003-2146-2442, Onur, Oezguer A. ORCID: 0000-0001-8336-7075, Grefkes, Christian, Fink, Gereon R. ORCID: 0000-0002-8230-1856, Barbe, Michael T. ORCID: 0000-0003-1149-8054 and Weiss, Peter H. ORCID: 0000-0002-5230-9080 (2026). Differential gait disturbances in patients with Parkinson's disease and normal pressure hydrocephalus. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 147. pp. 1-6. Elsevier. ISSN 1353-8020

[thumbnail of 1-s2.0-S1353802025008223-main.pdf] PDF
1-s2.0-S1353802025008223-main.pdf
Bereitstellung unter der CC-Lizenz: Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB)
Identification Number:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2025.108081

Abstract

[Artikel-Nr.: 108081] Introduction: Gait disturbances are a key symptom in normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) and Parkinson’s disease (PD). We employed instrument-supported gait analysis to characterize commonalities and differences in gait patterns among PD and NPH patients, as well as gait changes following disease-specific interventions (i.e., spinal tap and dopaminergic medication). Methods: Gait and balance analyses were conducted i) before and after NPH patients (n = 19) received a spinal tap, and ii) before and after PD patients (n = 19) received soluble dopaminergic medication. Change scores were calculated relative to each patient’s baseline performance. Group differences were analyzed using independent sample t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests and within-group changes using paired sample t-tests or Wilcoxon signed- rank tests. Results: Static postural control (i.e., balance) did not differ between patient groups, but dynamic postural control did, with PD patients showing significantly reduced mediolateral sway and gait width compared to NPH patients. These parameters did not change after disease-specific interventions. For gait dynamics, PD patients demon- strated significantly higher values in pace and force parameters, which improved significantly in both groups following intervention. Finally, gait regularity showed lower variability and better rhythm-related parameters in PD patients compared to NPH patients, along with differential changes after interventions. Conclusion: Except for static postural control (i.e., balance), instrument-supported gait analysis revealed several characteristic gait differences between PD and NPH patients. Variability and rhythm, reflecting gait regularity, were best suited to differentiate gait disturbances in patients with PD and NPH.

Item Type: Article
Creators:
Creators
Email
ORCID
ORCID Put Code
Semmler, Carolin
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
Wunderle, Veronika
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
Kuzu, Taylan D.
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
Onur, Oezguer A.
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
Grefkes, Christian
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
Fink, Gereon R.
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
Barbe, Michael T.
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
Weiss, Peter H.
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-811177
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2025.108081
Journal or Publication Title: Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
Volume: 147
Page Range: pp. 1-6
Number of Pages: 6
Date: 4 June 2026
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 1353-8020
Language: English
Faculty: External institution
Faculty of Medicine
Divisions: Außeruniversitäre Forschungseinrichtungen > Forschungszentrum Jülich
Faculty of Medicine > Neurologie > Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie
Subjects: Medical sciences Medicine
Uncontrolled Keywords:
Keywords
Language
Levodopa ; CSF ; Force ; Pressure-distribution ; Instrument-supported locomotion assessment
English
['eprint_fieldname_oa_funders' not defined]: Publikationsfonds UzK
Refereed: Yes
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/81117

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item