Hoier, David, Groß-Ophoff-Müller, Carolin, Franklin, Cindy ORCID: 0000-0001-9142-5423, Hallek, Michael ORCID: 0000-0002-7425-4455, von Stebut, Esther ORCID: 0000-0001-9802-9642, Elter, Thomas ORCID: 0000-0003-0748-7600, Mauch, Cornelia ORCID: 0000-0002-3989-0536, Kreuzberg, Nicole and Koll, Philipp ORCID: 0009-0001-2425-5345 (2024). Digital decision support for structural improvement of melanoma tumor boards: using standard cases to optimize workflow. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 150 (3). pp. 1-13. Springer Nature. ISSN 1432-1335

[thumbnail of s00432-024-05627-3.pdf] PDF
s00432-024-05627-3.pdf
Bereitstellung unter der CC-Lizenz: Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB)
Identification Number:10.1007/s00432-024-05627-3

Abstract

[Artikel-Nr.: 115] Purpose: Choosing optimal cancer treatment is challenging, and certified cancer centers must present all patients in multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDT). Our aim was to develop a decision support system (DSS) to provide treatment recommendations for apparently simple cases already at conference registration and to classify these as “standard cases”. According to certification requirements, discussion of standard cases is optional and would thus allow more time for complex cases. Methods: We created a smartphone query that simulated a tumor conference registration and requested all information needed to provide a recommendation. In total, 111 out of 705 malignant melanoma cases discussed at a skin cancer center from 2017 to 2020 were identified as potential standard cases, for which a digital twin recommendation was then generated by DSS. Results: The system provided reliable advice in all 111 cases and showed 97% concordance of MDT and DSS for therapeutic recommendations, regardless of tumor stage. Discrepancies included two cases (2%) where DSS advised discussions at MDT and one case (1%) with deviating recommendation due to advanced patient age. Conclusions: Our work aimed not to replace clinical expertise but to alleviate MDT workload and enhance focus on complex cases. Overall, our DSS proved to be a suitable tool for identifying standard cases as such, providing correct treatment recommendations, and thus reducing the time burden of tumor conferences in favor for the comprehensive discussion of complex cases. The aim is to implement the DSS in routine tumor board software for further qualitative assessment of its impact on oncological care.

Item Type: Article
Creators:
Creators
Email
ORCID
ORCID Put Code
Hoier, David
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
Groß-Ophoff-Müller, Carolin
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
Franklin, Cindy
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
Hallek, Michael
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
von Stebut, Esther
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
Elter, Thomas
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
Mauch, Cornelia
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
Kreuzberg, Nicole
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
Koll, Philipp
UNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-815190
Identification Number: 10.1007/s00432-024-05627-3
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
Volume: 150
Number: 3
Page Range: pp. 1-13
Number of Pages: 13
Date: 8 March 2024
Publisher: Springer Nature
ISSN: 1432-1335
Language: English
Faculty: Faculty of Medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Dermatologie > Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie
Faculty of Medicine > Innere Medizin > Klinik I für Innere Medizin - Hämatologie und Onkologie
Faculty of Medicine > Weitere > Centrum für integrierte Onkologie (CIO)
Subjects: Medical sciences Medicine
Uncontrolled Keywords:
Keywords
Language
Malignant melanoma ; Algorithm ; Multidisciplinary tumor board (MDT) ; Tumor board evaluation ; Digital recommendations ; Documentation burden · Digital health ; Mobile application ; Expert-curated decision support system ; Oncology
English
['eprint_fieldname_oa_funders' not defined]: Publikationsfonds UzK
Refereed: Yes
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/81519

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item