Werner, Jan-Michael, Stoffels, Gabriele, Lichtenstein, Thorsten, Borggrefe, Jan ORCID: 0000-0003-2908-7560, Lohmann, Philipp ORCID: 0000-0002-5360-046X, Ceccon, Garry, Shah, Nadim J., Fink, Gereon R. ORCID: 0000-0002-8230-1856, Langen, Karl-Josef ORCID: 0000-0003-1101-5075, Kabbasch, Christoph and Galldiks, Norbert ORCID: 0000-0002-2485-1796 (2019). Differentiation of treatment-related changes from tumour progression: a direct comparison between dynamic FET PET and ADC values obtained from DWI MRI. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging, 46 (9). S. 1889 - 1902. NEW YORK: SPRINGER. ISSN 1619-7089
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
BackgroundFollowing brain cancer treatment, the capacity of anatomical MRI to differentiate neoplastic tissue from treatment-related changes (e.g., pseudoprogression) is limited. This study compared apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) obtained by diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) with static and dynamic parameters of O-(2-[F-18]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) PET for the differentiation of treatment-related changes from tumour progression.Patients and methodsForty-eight pretreated high-grade glioma patients with anatomical MRI findings suspicious for progression (median time elapsed since last treatment was 16weeks) were investigated using DWI and dynamic FET PET. Maximum and mean tumour-to-brain ratios (TBRmax, TBRmean) as well as dynamic parameters (time-to-peak and slope values) of FET uptake were calculated. For mean ADC calculation, regions-of-interest analyses were performed on ADC maps calculated from DWI coregistered with the contrast-enhanced MR image. Diagnoses were confirmed neuropathologically (21%) or clinicoradiologically. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver-operating-characteristic analyses or Fisher's exact test for a combinational approach.ResultsTen of 48 patients had treatment-related changes (21%). The diagnostic performance of FET PET was significantly higher (threshold for both TBRmax and TBRmean, 1.95; accuracy, 83%; AUC, 0.890.05; P<0.001) than that of ADC values (threshold ADC, 1.09x10(-3)mm(2)/s; accuracy, 69%; AUC, 0.73 +/- 0.09; P=0.13). The addition of static FET PET parameters to ADC values increased the latter's accuracy to 89%. The highest accuracy was achieved by combining static and dynamic FET PET parameters (93%). Moreover, in contrast to ADC values, TBRs <1.95 at suspected progression predicted a significantly longer survival (P=0.01).Conclusions Data suggest that static and dynamic FET PET provide valuable information concerning the differentiation of early treatment-related changes from tumour progression and outperform ADC measurement for this highly relevant clinical question.
Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Creators: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
URN: | urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-134012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOI: | 10.1007/s00259-019-04384-7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal or Publication Title: | Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume: | 46 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number: | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Page Range: | S. 1889 - 1902 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date: | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher: | SPRINGER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Place of Publication: | NEW YORK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN: | 1619-7089 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Language: | English | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faculty: | Unspecified | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Divisions: | Unspecified | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subjects: | no entry | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refereed: | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
URI: | http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/13401 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Altmetric
Export
Actions (login required)
View Item |