Abbink, Klaus and Dogan, Gonul (2019). How to choose your victim. Games Econ. Behav., 113. S. 482 - 497. SAN DIEGO: ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE. ISSN 1090-2473

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

We introduce the experimental mobbing game. Each player in a group has the option to nominate one of the other players or to nominate no one. If the same person is nominated by all other players, he loses his payoff and the mob gains. We conduct three sets of experiments to study the effects of monetary gains, fear of being mobbed, and different types of focality. In the repeated mobbing game, we find that subjects frequently coordinate on selecting a victim, even for modest gains. Higher gains make mobbing more likely. We find no evidence that fear of becoming the victim explains mobbing. Richer and poorer players are equally focal. Pity plays no role in mobbing decisions. Ingroup members - introduced by colours - are less likely to be victims, and both payoff difference and colour difference serve as strong coordination devices. Commonly employed social preference theories do not explain our findings. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Abbink, KlausUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Dogan, GonulUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-139297
DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2018.10.006
Journal or Publication Title: Games Econ. Behav.
Volume: 113
Page Range: S. 482 - 497
Date: 2019
Publisher: ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
Place of Publication: SAN DIEGO
ISSN: 1090-2473
Language: English
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
STRATEGIC UNCERTAINTY; COORDINATION GAMES; COMMUNICATION; SELECTION; SPITEMultiple languages
EconomicsMultiple languages
Refereed: Yes
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/13929

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item