Wielsch, Dan (2018). Contract Interpretation Regimes. Mod. Law Rev., 81 (6). S. 958 - 989. HOBOKEN: WILEY. ISSN 1468-2230

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Freedom of contract requires the integrity of social institutions that ensure the preconditions for private autonomy. This has been largely ignored by a private law doctrine that works on the assumption of the state being the supplier of background justice. The article argues for an institutional turn in contract interpretation. Depending on whether contracts can link up to existing conventions or have to create their institutional context in the first place, courts may apply either an 'institution-preserving interpretation' or an 'institution-creating interpretation'. This implies the need to refrain from following universal rules of contractual interpretation. Rather, legal doctrine should focus on the development of sector-specific standards of interpretation and on support for private legal regimes that ensure socially reflexive constructions of contracts.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Wielsch, DanUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-167684
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12375
Journal or Publication Title: Mod. Law Rev.
Volume: 81
Number: 6
Page Range: S. 958 - 989
Date: 2018
Publisher: WILEY
Place of Publication: HOBOKEN
ISSN: 1468-2230
Language: English
Faculty: Faculty of Law
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Zivilrecht > Professur für Bürgerliches Recht und Rechtstheorie
Subjects: Law
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
LAWMultiple languages
LawMultiple languages
Refereed: Yes
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/16768

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item