Siemens, D. Robert, Klotz, Laurence, Heidenreich, Axel, Chowdhury, Simon, Villers, Arnauld, Baron, Benoit, van Os, Steve, Hasabou, Nahla, Wang, Fong, Lin, Ping and Shore, Neal D. (2018). Efficacy and Safety of Enzalutamide vs Bicalutamide in Younger and Older Patients with Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer in the TERRAIN Trial. J. Urol., 199 (1). S. 147 - 155. NEW YORK: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC. ISSN 1527-3792

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Purpose: Enzalutamide significantly prolonged median progression-free survival vs bicalutamide in chemotherapy naive men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer in the TERRAIN (Enzalutamide versus Bicalutamide in Castrate Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer) trial. In this post hoc analysis we investigated the influence of age on the efficacy and safety of enzalutamide vs bicalutamide in this population. Materials and Methods: Patients were randomized 1: 1 to enzalutamide 160 mg per day or bicalutamide 50 mg per day. Progression-free survival, time to prostate specific antigen progression and safety were analyzed post hoc in younger (age less than 75 years) and older (age 75 years or greater) subgroups. Results: Enzalutamide significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death vs bicalutamide in patients younger than 75 years (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.27-0.52, p < 0.0001) and 75 years old or older (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.92, p = 0.018). Time to prostate specific antigen progression was also significantly prolonged with enzalutamide vs bicalutamide in each subgroup. The adverse event distribution between treatments was similar in each subgroup except for more (5% or greater difference between subgroups) atrial fibrillation, urinary tract infections, falls and decreased appetite as well as less extremity pain and hot flushing in enzalutamide treated patients 75 years old or older, and less back pain and hot flushing in bicalutamide treated patients 75 years old or older. Grade 3 or greater cardiac events were more frequent in enzalutamide treated and bicalutamide treated patients who were 75 years old or older vs younger than 75 years. Fatigue was more frequent in enzalutamide treated patients with a similar distribution in each age subgroup. Conclusions: Enzalutamide improved clinical outcomes vs bicalutamide irrespective of age. Increased falls and cardiac events suggest caution when prescribing to older patients (age 75 years or greater) with significant comorbidity.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Siemens, D. RobertUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Klotz, LaurenceUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Heidenreich, AxelUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Chowdhury, SimonUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Villers, ArnauldUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Baron, BenoitUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
van Os, SteveUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Hasabou, NahlaUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Wang, FongUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Lin, PingUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Shore, Neal D.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-204778
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.08.080
Journal or Publication Title: J. Urol.
Volume: 199
Number: 1
Page Range: S. 147 - 155
Date: 2018
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Place of Publication: NEW YORK
ISSN: 1527-3792
Language: English
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
CHEMOTHERAPY; MEN; DOCETAXELMultiple languages
Urology & NephrologyMultiple languages
Refereed: Yes
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/20477

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item