Lohmar, Dieter (2020). The Time of Phantasy and the Limits of Individuation. Husserl Stud., 36 (3). S. 241 - 255. DORDRECHT: SPRINGER. ISSN 1572-8501

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Husserl is known to have oriented many aspects of his extensive analyses of phantasy around a contrast to perception: what phantasy and perception have in common, for example, is their intuitiveness; yet, while in perception something is encountered 'in the flesh,' in phantasy this experience is modified by its 'as ifin the flesh' character. However, both in the majority of Husserl's reflections on phantasy and in much of the secondary literature on the topic, we find few further details concerning the difference between both modes of intuitiveness: 'in the flesh' and 'as ifin the flesh.' In this paper, I draw on sources from Husserl's later work in order to get clarification on at least one important point of difference, namely the ways in which individuation and identity, that is, constitutions of individual and identical objects, clearly set apart phantasy from perception. As we will see, this requires an understanding of Husserl's account of objective time, and of the constitution of individual identical objects with their unique positions in objective time. After an introductory discussion of the meaning and the conditions of individuation in the methodical framework of phenomenology, I will lay out the different levels of the constitution of objective time (1+2). In the second part of the paper, I will try to follow and explore one of Husserl's arguments that contrasts the constitutional performances involved in the constitution of phantasy objects with the individuation of real objects in objective time (3+4). The textual basis for this discussion is to be found in Husserl's last book,Experience and Judgement. In what follows, I will begin with a short discussion of the concepts of individuality, individuation, uniqueness and identity, and also ask why these issues may be of special interest for a phenomenologist who is investigating the phenomenon of phantasy.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Lohmar, DieterUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-318634
DOI: 10.1007/s10743-020-09274-7
Journal or Publication Title: Husserl Stud.
Volume: 36
Number: 3
Page Range: S. 241 - 255
Date: 2020
Publisher: SPRINGER
Place of Publication: DORDRECHT
ISSN: 1572-8501
Language: English
Faculty: Faculty of Arts and Humanities
Divisions: Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Fächergruppe 8: Philosophie > Philosophisches Seminar > Husserl-Archiv
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
PhilosophyMultiple languages
Refereed: Yes
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/31863

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item