Siebelmann, Sebastian, Janetzko, Mona, Koenig, Peter, Scholz, Paula, Matthaei, Mario, Haendel, Alexander, Cursiefen, Claus and Bachmann, Bjoern (2020). Flushing Versus Pushing Technique for Graft Implantation in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. Cornea, 39 (5). S. 605 - 609. PHILADELPHIA: LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS. ISSN 1536-4798
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
Purpose: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) has developed into a safe procedure for the replacement of diseased corneal endothelium. However, DMEK still results in a significant donor endothelial cell loss. Here, we compare 2 different graft implantation techniques. Methods: Twenty patients undergoing DMEK, where a DMEK injection cartridge was used to flush the graft into the anterior chamber (G-38635 single-use DMEK-Cartridge; Geuder AG, Heidelberg, Germany; group A), were retrospectively compared with 20 patients, where a standard lens injection cartridge (AT.Smart Cartridge; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany; group B) was used to push the graft with a plunger. Outcome parameters were intraoperative orientation of the graft, insertion-to-attachment time, rebubbling rates, and postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, endothelial cell count, and central corneal thickness after 12 months. The surfaces of both cartridges were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Results: In group A, the insertion-to-attachment time was significantly higher (P = 0.003). Initially, the graft was oriented correctly in 40% of the patients in group A compared with 90% in group B (P = 0.001). No differences were obtained between both groups regarding central corneal thickness, endothelial cell count or best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, and rebubbling rates after 12 months. Scanning electron microscopy analysis demonstrated a rougher and sharper surface of the shooter of group B. Conclusions: This study shows significant differences between both insertion techniques regarding correct graft orientation directly after graft implantation leading to prolonged insertion-to-attachment time when the graft is flushed instead of pushed into the anterior chamber.
Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Creators: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
URN: | urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-335114 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOI: | 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002239 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal or Publication Title: | Cornea | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume: | 39 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number: | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Page Range: | S. 605 - 609 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date: | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher: | LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Place of Publication: | PHILADELPHIA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN: | 1536-4798 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Language: | English | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faculty: | Unspecified | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Divisions: | Unspecified | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subjects: | no entry | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
URI: | http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/33511 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Altmetric
Export
Actions (login required)
View Item |