Siebelmann, Sebastian, Janetzko, Mona, Koenig, Peter, Scholz, Paula, Matthaei, Mario, Haendel, Alexander, Cursiefen, Claus and Bachmann, Bjoern (2020). Flushing Versus Pushing Technique for Graft Implantation in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. Cornea, 39 (5). S. 605 - 609. PHILADELPHIA: LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS. ISSN 1536-4798

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Purpose: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) has developed into a safe procedure for the replacement of diseased corneal endothelium. However, DMEK still results in a significant donor endothelial cell loss. Here, we compare 2 different graft implantation techniques. Methods: Twenty patients undergoing DMEK, where a DMEK injection cartridge was used to flush the graft into the anterior chamber (G-38635 single-use DMEK-Cartridge; Geuder AG, Heidelberg, Germany; group A), were retrospectively compared with 20 patients, where a standard lens injection cartridge (AT.Smart Cartridge; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany; group B) was used to push the graft with a plunger. Outcome parameters were intraoperative orientation of the graft, insertion-to-attachment time, rebubbling rates, and postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, endothelial cell count, and central corneal thickness after 12 months. The surfaces of both cartridges were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Results: In group A, the insertion-to-attachment time was significantly higher (P = 0.003). Initially, the graft was oriented correctly in 40% of the patients in group A compared with 90% in group B (P = 0.001). No differences were obtained between both groups regarding central corneal thickness, endothelial cell count or best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, and rebubbling rates after 12 months. Scanning electron microscopy analysis demonstrated a rougher and sharper surface of the shooter of group B. Conclusions: This study shows significant differences between both insertion techniques regarding correct graft orientation directly after graft implantation leading to prolonged insertion-to-attachment time when the graft is flushed instead of pushed into the anterior chamber.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Siebelmann, SebastianUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Janetzko, MonaUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Koenig, PeterUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Scholz, PaulaUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Matthaei, MarioUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Haendel, AlexanderUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Cursiefen, ClausUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Bachmann, BjoernUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-335114
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002239
Journal or Publication Title: Cornea
Volume: 39
Number: 5
Page Range: S. 605 - 609
Date: 2020
Publisher: LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Place of Publication: PHILADELPHIA
ISSN: 1536-4798
Language: English
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
DMEK; 20-PERCENT; AIRMultiple languages
OphthalmologyMultiple languages
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/33511

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item