Universität zu Köln

Rosa, Luis (2021). Rational requirements for suspended judgment. Philos. Stud., 178 (2). S. 385 - 407. DORDRECHT: SPRINGER. ISSN 1573-0883

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

How does rationality bind the agnostic, that is, the one who suspends judgment about whether a given proposition is true? In this paper I explore two alternative ways of establishing what the rational requirements of agnosticism are: the Lockean-Bayesian framework and the doxastic logic framework. Each of these proposals faces strong objections. Fortunately, however, there is a rich kernel of requirements of agnosticism that are vindicated by both of them. One can then endorse the requirements that belong to that kernel without thereby committing oneself to the problematic implications that stem from either of the aforementioned proposals.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID ORCID Put Code Rosa, Luis UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED
URN:	urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-341642
DOI:	10.1007/s11098-020-01437-8
Journal or Publication Title:	Philos. Stud.
Volume:	178
Number:	2
Page Range:	S. 385 - 407
Date:	2021
Publisher:	SPRINGER
Place of Publication:	DORDRECHT
ISSN:	1573-0883
Language:	English
Faculty:	Unspecified
Divisions:	Unspecified
Subjects:	no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Keywords Language BELIEF; CREDENCE; LOTTERY; LOGIC Multiple languages Philosophy Multiple languages
URI:	http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/34164