Muenzberg, M., Paffrath, T., Matthes, G., Mahlke, L., Swartman, B., Hoffman, M., Lefering, R. and Woelfl, C. G. (2013). Does ATLS trauma training fit into Western countries: evaluation of the first 8 years of ATLS in Germany. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg., 39 (5). S. 517 - 523. HEIDELBERG: SPRINGER HEIDELBERG. ISSN 1863-9941

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

With over 2 million certified physicians worldwide, the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) program is one of the most successful international medical education programs. Germany joined the ATLS program in 2003. Before implementation of the program, there was a controversial discussion as to whether a country like Germany with a long history of trauma care needed ATLS at all. 197 courses with nearly 3,000 providers were performed until December 2010. We assessed the course evaluations since the implementation of ATLS in Germany using the participants' systematic feedback. During the course, each participant evaluated each presentation, skill station, and simulation on a rating scale from 1 to 4 (1 being the best, 4 being the worst). The participants completed the evaluation forms during the course and before they received their results. The course coordinator made sure that all forms were returned. The feedback forms were collected anonymously and were entered into a database. Statistical analysis was performed using frequencies and mean values. The cumulative evaluation of all courses revealed an average performance score of 1.39 (1.06-1.86; n = 197). The lectures, skill stations, and simulations were individually evaluated as follows: lectures 1.61 (1.00-2.81; n = 197), skill stations 1.40 (1.00-2.40; n = 197), and surgical skill stations 1.35 (1.00-2.38; n = 197). Practical skills simulation (case scenarios) received the highest grade of 1.24 (1.00-1.57; n = 197). There were no significant changes during the time concerning the results of the evaluation. The overall assessment showed constantly good and excellent evaluations by the participants over the years. In general, skill stations and simulations performed better than lectures. According to these results, the course format is well accepted by the participants and, therefore, can be recommended to all physicians treating trauma patients. Our results also underline the value of such a course format in an industrial country with an already established trauma system.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Muenzberg, M.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Paffrath, T.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Matthes, G.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Mahlke, L.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Swartman, B.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Hoffman, M.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Lefering, R.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Woelfl, C. G.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-474886
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-013-0316-0
Journal or Publication Title: Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg.
Volume: 39
Number: 5
Page Range: S. 517 - 523
Date: 2013
Publisher: SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
Place of Publication: HEIDELBERG
ISSN: 1863-9941
Language: English
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
LIFE SUPPORT(R); MULTIPLE TRAUMA; IMPROVEMENT; EDUCATION; CAREMultiple languages
Emergency MedicineMultiple languages
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/47488

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item