Reutlinger, Alexander (2013). Can Interventionists Be Neo-Russellians? Interventionism, the Open Systems Argument, and the Arrow of Entropy. Int. Stud. Philos. Sci., 27 (3). S. 273 - 294. ABINGDON: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. ISSN 1469-9281

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Several proponents of the interventionist theory of causation have recently argued for a neo-Russellian account of causation. The article discusses two strategies for interventionists to be neo-Russellians. First, I argue that the open systems argument-the main argument for a neo-Russellian account advocated by interventionists-fails. Second, I explore and discuss an alternative for interventionists who wish to be neo-Russellians: the statistical-mechanical account. Although the latter account is an attractive alternative, it is argued that interventionists are not able to adopt it straightforwardly. Hence, to be neo-Russellians remains a challenge for interventionists.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Reutlinger, AlexanderUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-476211
DOI: 10.1080/02698595.2013.825497
Journal or Publication Title: Int. Stud. Philos. Sci.
Volume: 27
Number: 3
Page Range: S. 273 - 294
Date: 2013
Publisher: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
Place of Publication: ABINGDON
ISSN: 1469-9281
Language: English
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
CAUSATION; WOODWARD; 'MAKING-THINGS-HAPPEN'Multiple languages
History & Philosophy Of ScienceMultiple languages
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/47621

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item