Higashigaito, Kai, Fischer, Gioia, Jungblut, Lisa, Bluthgen, Christian ORCID: 0000-0001-7321-5676, Schwyzer, Moritz, Eberhard, Matthias, dos Santos, Daniel Pinto, Baessler, Bettina, Vuylsteke, Pieter, Soons, Joris A. M. and Frauenfelder, Thomas (2022). Comparison of detection of trauma-related injuries using combined all-in-onefused images and conventionally reconstructed images in acute trauma CT. Eur. Radiol., 32 (6). S. 3903 - 3912. NEW YORK: SPRINGER. ISSN 1432-1084

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Objectives To compare the accuracy of lesion detection of trauma-related injuries using combined all-in-one fused (AIO) and conventionally reconstructed images (CR) in acute trauma CT. Methods In this retrospective study, trauma CT of 66 patients (median age 47 years, range 18-96 years; 20 female (30.3%)) were read using AIO and CR. Images were independently reviewed by 4 blinded radiologists (two residents and two consultants) for trauma-related injuries in 22 regions. Sub-analyses were performed to analyze the influence of experience (residents vs. consultants) and body region (chest, abdomen, skeletal structures) on lesion detection. Paired t-test was used to compare the accuracy of lesion detection. The effect size was calculated (Cohen's d). Linear mixed-effects model with patients as the fixed effect and random forest models were used to investigate the effect of experience, reconstruction/image processing, and body region on lesion detection. Results Reading time of residents was significantly faster using AIO (AIO: 266 +/- 72 s, CR: 318 +/- 113 s; p < 0.001; d = 0.46) while no significant difference was observed in the accuracy of lesion detection (AIO: 93.5 +/- 6.0%, CR: 94.6 +/- 6.0% p= 0.092; d= -0.21). Reading time of consultants showed no significant difference (AIO: 283 +/- 82 s, CR: 274 +/- 95 s; p= 0.067; d= 0.16). Accuracy was significantly higher using CR; however, the difference and effect size were very small (AIO 95.1 +/- 4.9%, CR: 97.3 +/- 3.7%, p= 0.002; d= - 0.39). The linear mixed-effects model showed only minor effect of image processing/reconstruction for lesion detection. Conclusions Residents at the emergency department might benefit from faster reading time without sacrificing lesion detection rate using AIO for trauma CT.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Higashigaito, KaiUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Fischer, GioiaUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Jungblut, LisaUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Bluthgen, ChristianUNSPECIFIEDorcid.org/0000-0001-7321-5676UNSPECIFIED
Schwyzer, MoritzUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Eberhard, MatthiasUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
dos Santos, Daniel PintoUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Baessler, BettinaUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Vuylsteke, PieterUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Soons, Joris A. M.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Frauenfelder, ThomasUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-675481
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08473-w
Journal or Publication Title: Eur. Radiol.
Volume: 32
Number: 6
Page Range: S. 3903 - 3912
Date: 2022
Publisher: SPRINGER
Place of Publication: NEW YORK
ISSN: 1432-1084
Language: English
Faculty: Unspecified
Divisions: Unspecified
Subjects: no entry
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; WINDOWMultiple languages
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical ImagingMultiple languages
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/67548

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item