Berger, Klaus Peter (2019). Common Law v. Civil Law in International Arbitration: The Beginning or the End? J. Int. Arbitr., 36 (3). S. 295 - 314. ALPHEN AAN DEN RIJN: KLUWER LAW INT. ISSN 2212-182X

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

The presentation of the Prague Rules on the Efficient Conduct of Proceedings in International Arbitration on 14 December 2018 has revived the age-old debate about the existence of a common law-civil law divide in international arbitration. This article examines the impact of the Prague Rules on the transnational paradigm of international arbitral procedure, clarifies their nature as an alternative repository of state-of-the-art techniques to save time and costs in the conduct of international arbitrations, and suggests to give up the traditional distinctions, which are rooted in domestic legal systems.

Item Type: Journal Article
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCIDORCID Put Code
Berger, Klaus PeterUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:38-138969
Journal or Publication Title: J. Int. Arbitr.
Volume: 36
Number: 3
Page Range: S. 295 - 314
Date: 2019
Publisher: KLUWER LAW INT
Place of Publication: ALPHEN AAN DEN RIJN
ISSN: 2212-182X
Language: English
Faculty: Faculty of Law
Divisions: Faculty of Law > Zivilrecht > Professur für Bürgerliches Recht, Deutsches und Internationales Handels- Wirtschafts- und Bankrecht, Internationales Privatrecht und Rechtsvergleich
Subjects: Law
Uncontrolled Keywords:
KeywordsLanguage
LawMultiple languages
Refereed: Yes
URI: http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/id/eprint/13896

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item